Post your essay. Get expert feedback. For free.We're trying to help students improve their writing the hard way, providing expert reviews for free to students who want to work on becoming great writers. Do you know any students who want informed, critical feedback about the argument, coherence, organization, and general quality of their essays from a professor of English Literature? Click like to share. Click the button to sign up and post an original essay. It's always free, and always honest. Keep reading to help out.
We Need Your Help
EssayJudge provides critical feedback for free to students who seek help writing their essays. Essay reviews published here are a free learning and pedagogical resource for students and teachers. Unlike commercal sites, we don't charge for any service. We don't sell any product. We don't enable plagiarism.
Can you help students and teachers find EssayJudge.com? Perhaps the easiest way to do that is to share on Facebook (there's a button up there somewhere), but you can also write about the site on your blog or your school website, or tweet about it, or just talk about it loudly in bars and coffee shops.
If you are a teacher, can you volunteer 30 minutes a week, or can you submit useful, classroom-tested, essay writing advice? You can email us at firstname.lastname@example.org. If you want to share, perhaps you can link to essayjudge.com from your school website, but please do not require students to submit work to this site. We are trying to provide a servivce to self-motivated learners. Forcing students to participate defeats the purpose.
If you are a student, can you help this project? If you submit original work, you get free expert feedback, but you also help others find the site by producing searchable content. The review of your essay will be helpful to you, but it may also be helpful to others. We are not trying to help you improve your grades. We are trying to help you improve your writing. Consider submitting work for feedback even if it's already graded, but please do not submit work that has already been published elsewhere, because duplicated content reduces the visibility of the site as a whole (according to Mr. Google), and we are trying to make expert writing advice available to as many students as possible.
Quotations from the Reviews
from the review of "Slavery’s Dehumanizing Effects":
The strength of your essay is your realization of what is most important in terms of the content of Douglass' Narrative, its deep understanding of the negative impact of slavery beyond the cruelty exacted upon the slaves themselves. In your final paragraph you say this: “In analysis, Douglass effectively proves that slavery has a soul-killing effect on the slaveholders. Through the use of flashback, characterization, and imagery he effectively persuades the reader that slavery is contrary to the laws of nature.” The first of these two sentences is true and insightful. The second is partially true and trivial. What’s missing from your essay is an articulation of the link between the Narrative's analytic power and its persuasive power
from the review of "My Life":
If you fix nothing else here, fix “candy stripper.” Never has the addition of a single letter had such a devastating impact on the intended meaning of a phrase.
from the review of "'Essay on Journey's End' and 'Birdsong'":
The thesis of the essay is the biggest problem here. You don’t really have one. It doesn’t seem arguable, in any case, to say that these two works show the tedium of war. ... One general way to make a thesis arguable is to cite other opinions and disagree with them. You are clearly aware of this approach ... but your adoption of that approach is a little superficial. You refer to “some people” with whom you disagree, but don’t actually cite any specific sources. ... The essay moves from one topic to the next, and from one book to the other and back again, in an apparently random fashion. If you had a strong, complex argument to make, then you could organize the essay around the elaboration of that argument, but it doesn’t really seem that you are trying to convince your reader of anything beyond the fact that there are a couple of examples in these works that show men trying to cope with boredom; or when you go beyond that, as you do when you compare earwig races to horse races, the analysis seems to be merely ancillary.
from the review of "Pick Me!":
Finally, since I agree that ethics are important, perhaps you’ll forgive me for pointing out that your existence will be more ethically justifiable if you make a commitment never again to use the phrase “in no way, shape, or form” ... and never try to pass off “extra-curricular” as a noun.
from the review of "What is Death?"
The sublime irony of your essay is that even though it demonstrates (especially, but not only, in the second paragraph) a kind of entrenched unwillingness to bring the question of the meaning of death into its contemplation of life, it’s major insight, nonetheless, is that a life that flees from that question is in some sense inauthentic or incomplete. But an essay that hides its major insight beneath the false security blanket of platitudinous drivel is also inauthentic and incomplete. I suggest that you raise your insight to the level of an explicit thesis and ruthlessly delete everything that doesn’t help elaborate that thesis.
Sakunthala Panditharatne redesigned the entire website.
Jamison Dance fixed innumerable bugs in the code. Visit his blog: JamisonDance.com